Side Streets ~ Neighborhood people and issues

Archive for the 'Jack Scheuerman' Tag

WHAT THE HECK DO THESE COVENANTS MEAN?

January 17th, 2013, 1:52 pm by

Terry Bott thought she did everything right when she bought her home in Trail Ridge South neighborhood in Northgate in 2003.

“I read all the covenants,” said Bott, an accountant who works for a homebuilder. “There were some I didn’t like. I can’t have a clothes line, for example. I think that’s stupid. But I agreed to abide by it.

“I told myself I was willing to abide by everything in the covenants even though I didn’t like all the stuff.”

So she was angry in 2006 when the board of the Trail Ridge South Homeowners Association passed rules prohibiting homeowners from parking on neighborhood streets, which are public.  She’s been fighting the HOA ever since.

First, she volunteered to serve on the board to work for change.

After a couple of years she resigned, but has continued to challenge the rule, which allows guests to the neighborhood to park on the street. Just not homeowners.

Bott went back to her copy of the covenants, which govern things such as landscaping, paint colors, displays of signs and flags and changes to a home.

Every buyer in a covenant-protected neighborhood agrees to honor the covenants, which are enforced by volunteer boards that police the neighborhood. Often, property management companies are hired to collect dues, maintain commonly owned neighborhood parks, pools and rights-of-way and do the dirty work of enforcement.

Anyway, Bott studied the covenants, written by the developer in 2001, and found only one reference to parking.

“The covenants only say abandoned cars after five days and recreational vehicles can not park in the street,” Bott said.

Trail Ridge South resident Terry Bott says she studied the covenants before buying in the neighborhood in 2003 because she specifically wanted to be able to park in front of her home. She is upset the Homeowners Association board passed a rule in 2006 banning on-street parking by residents.

So I gave the covenants a look. I’m not exactly Stephen J. Hawking, but I can read. What I read left me puzzled. (Shocking, I know.) There was one paragraph on parking: Section 4.11 Restrictions on Parking and Storage.

Sure enough, it bans abandoned vehicles. It requires garage doors to be kept closed except “when in immediate use” by a vehicle. It goes on to say: “Boats, recreational vehicles, campers, motor homes, trailers and other such vehicles shall be kept in the garage” . . . “and shall in no event be parked on the streets” of the neighborhood.

The HOA board read that paragraph as permission to adopt a rule six years ago banning parking by home-owners.

Trail Ridge South HOA president Amy Umiamaka

HOA president Amy Umiamaka wasn’t on the board at the time. But she said the board was concerned about safety of children riding bikes and appearance.

“It sure does make the neighborhood look nicer,” Umiamaka said.

To appease Bott, she said, the HOA board finally solicited a legal opinion from attorney Lenard Rioth last fall.

In a November letter to the HOA, Rioth said he believed the rule prohibiting parking was valid. He concluded the “other such vehicles” language applies to car and trucks.

“It’s pretty straight-forward,” Rioth told me. “There’s plenty of case law to support the board.”

But another longtime HOA attorney, Jack Scheuerman, said it wasn’t so simple.

“Banning parking exceeds the authority they have under the covenants,” Scheuerman told me. “I think a judge would shoot it down.”

Shocking, isn’t it, that neighbors and lawyers all disagree?

Bott is convinced she has the right to park on the street and it doesn’t matter if a majority of her neighbors agree with the board’s actions.

I’ve talked to neighbors on both sides of the question. The community certainly is divided.

Some say it’s imperative to the safety of neighborhood children to keep cars off the street. Others say it’s unfair to allow guests to park on the street but not homeowners. Some have several teenage drivers and no room in their driveways for all the cars.

Bott seems determined to resolve the question of what Section 4.11 really means.

“I’m not going to drop this,” she said. “I resigned from the HOA board because I thought what they were trying to do was wrong.”

She said the dispute has led to heated board meetings and confrontations.

“I’ve been told by a board member that I should move if I do not like what they are doing. These guys need to be stopped.”

Here’s a guess: a judge ultimately will decide the definition of “other such vehicles.”

======================================

YOU HAVE JUST ENTERED THE HOA TWILIGHT ZONE

September 25th, 2011, 11:30 am by

Dietmar and Jean Voitel

 

Dietmar Voitel is trapped in an HOA Twilight Zone and it’s making him crazy because none of his neighbors seem to care.

He lives in the tiny Canterbury neighborhood within the Ridgeview at Stetson Hills subdivision. As some yards around him go to weeds and a few houses deteriorate, his Canterbury homeowners association board is AWOL.

The board, in fact, evaporated, leaving no one to oversee covenants like parking and weeds and paint colors.

“Our HOA is coming unglued,” Dietmar told me. “We no longer have a board. And the HOA members are not interested in coming to meetings.”

A number of HOAs have gone dormant around the Springs over the years. But Canterbury is different.

Thanks to an odd decision by the last remaining board member, the board has been vacant but dues are still being collected by Colorado Association Management , a subsidiary of Associa, a national HOA management company.

CAS collects $150 a year from each of Canterbury’s 55 homeowners. CAS uses the cash to pay the association’s taxes and mails notices of meetings no one in Canterbury attends.

That’s about it.

CAS does no covenant enforcement, no inspections, no architectural control. Just collects $8,250 from homeowners, pays itself $3,000, calls it a day.

Looking south down Tomiche Drive near its intersection with Summit Peak Drive at Horace Shelby Park.

Oh, and CAS pays an HOA attorney for collection services on delinquent accounts.

“They are collecting money and doing nothing,” Dietmar said. “How can this happen?”

It happens because the last board member to serve — before he sold his house and moved away in early 2010 — signed a contract with CAS authorizing it to handle HOA finances. The fine print included a clause that automatically renews the contract each year, whether there’s an HOA board or not.

CAS branch manager Greg Smith said he sympathized with Dietmar and shared his frustration.

“Mr. Voitel wants the association revived,” Smith said. “He wants a thriving community to help improve property values. He wants us to do inspections and covenant enforcement. But we can’t. We’re not authorized to do it.”

Most surprising is that the neighbors seem fine with it. In May, Voitel and his wife, Jean, contacted every neighbor, exposing the dues payments and trying to gauge their interest in the HOA. They also invited everyone to a meeting which Smith coordinated. Only one other homeowner showed up.

Jack Scheuerman, an attorney who represents 170 HOAs, said Canterbury is unique.

“I just don’t see this,” he said. “Apathy to this point is unusual. Usually, it’s just the opposite – people get too involved in their HOA.”

Scheuerman said it would an involved and expensive process to dissolve the HOA, which is a legal corporation with specific rules and fiduciary obligations and responsibilities.

It would be best, he said, if three homeowners took control by gathering support either through attendance at a special meeting or by collecting proxies.

Dietmar would like a thriving HOA. But he’d be happy with any decision of the neighborhood.

“I want things to run properly,” Dietmar said. “But we don’t necessarily need an HOA. If they want to dissolve it, let’s do it. But let’s stop paying for something that gives us absolutely nothing in return.”

==================================================================