Side Streets ~ Neighborhood people and issues

Archive for the 'Fountain' Tag

WOODMOOR IS CAUGHT IN THE RAT RACE

October 19th, 2011, 3:50 pm by

Hey all you fans of the Southern Delivery System water pipeline . . . if you were thinking of moving out of Colorado Springs to escape the cost, don’t bother househunting in Woodmoor!

Folks there who wanted to move to the country and get away from big-city politics, angry public hearings and big fee increases imposed by public officials in defiance of the will of the people are being disappointed.

That’s the case for Woodmoor resident Jennifer Davis.

She and her family moved from California’s Bay Area to Woodmoor in 2008 in hopes of a quieter life.

But all the issues of the city seem to have followed her to Woodmoor, the unincorporated community of 3,000 homes east of Monument.

“I’m frustrated,” Davis said Tuesday, still fuming after attending a meeting Monday night of the five-member Woodmoor Water and Sanitation District Boardwhere 140 or so residents showed up to protect the proposed $30 million purchase of 3,300 acres of the JV Ranch near Fountain.

The ranch, owned by relatives of the late John Venezia, who developed Briargate and Peregrine, is coveted for its water rights. (Colorado Springs paid Venezia $3.2 million for 3,680 adjacent acres in 1989.)

The Woodmoor water board voted unanimously to buy the land after hours of emotional testimony and a near unanimous vote by the people in opposition to the purchase.

“It was power politics,” Davis said. “They didn’t listen to anything any of us said. Their minds were made up. Basically, they told us ‘We’re buying you a ranch and you’re going to pay for it and you’re going to like it.’ I was so dismayed by the arrogance of those people.”

Davis and others say they feel betrayed by the five board members. (Gazette IT expert Beth Courrau is on the board.)

Several Woodmoor residents asked me how the board could ignore the residents and saddle the water district’s 8,350 residential and business customers with a huge debt. Average residential water rates will increase $50 a month to pay for the ranch.

A large portion of the JV Ranch, southeast of Fountain, is seen on the El Paso County Assessor's website. The Woodmoor Water and Sanitation District voted Monday, Oct. 17, 2011, to pay up to $30 million for 3,300 acres of the ranch to obtain its water rights.

 Worse, neighbors say, they will have to spend perhaps $100 million more to build a pipeline to deliver the water uphill to Woodmoor.

(Where have I heard this scenario before? Actually, Springs Utilities is paying about $2.3 billion in phase one of the SDS pipeline project. The eventual full price is unknown.)

“I’m shocked,” said Bob Benton, a 15-year Woodmoor resident. Benton left the meeting early, convinced the board would never proceed in the face of such fierce opposition.

“That’s impossible,” Benton said.

The 3,300 acres of the JV Ranch to be purchased by the Woodmoor Water and Sanitation District includes Calhan Reservoir, seen here. A 3,680-acre parcel purchased by Colorado Springs in 1989 is just east of this property.

“I’m completely shocked. More than 130 people voted ‘No’ at the meeting. Emphatically no. I’ve never been more disgusted in my life.”

Carolyn Streit-Carey also attended the meeting and was sickened by the vote.

“It was a sham,” she said. “The board simply went through the motions of holding a public hearing. They didn’t listen to anyone. I think most of the people in the audience felt betrayed.”

 

This is a map of the Woodmoor Water and Sanitation District service area.

Water district manager Jessie Shaffer defended the vote as the right thing to do.

Groundwater is diminishing, he said. A reliable source is imperative. Woodmoor’s future is at stake.

Tell that to the neighbors.

.

.

.

.

.

.

To read more about SDS, click here for an archive of Gazette stories.

==========================================================

APPARENTLY, COLORADO SPRINGS IS NO OAKLAND!

September 21st, 2011, 1:09 pm by

I was having a tough time with this one . . . New York City and even Oakland rank higher than Colorado Springs in walkability.

Oakland? Really?

A recent ranking placed Colorado Springs just 34th among large U.S. communities in walkability.

Whoa! This is where you can get on a trail in Palmer Lake and walk, run or bike 35 miles all the way to Fountain!

 How can we rank behind top-rated New York City in walkability?  New York scores an 85 and the Springs gets a measly 45?

The Springs has 102-miles of urban trails — and 100 more under development. Are they comparing the Midland Trail to some alley in Queens?

 Even worse, the  top 10 “walkable” cities includes Oakland? Ever try walking around Oakland?

OMG

Heck, we have trails that snake from downtown through our neighborhoods to our sprawling suburbs, which cover 200 square miles.

 Bingo!

 As usual, I had stumbled onto the exact point of the walkability ranking by Seattle-based Walk Score without realizing it.

 The ranking is not about places to stroll or bike along scenic streams or through pine-scented forests.

 It scores residents’ ability to do basic errands on foot or bike. The Springs fell in the “car dependent” category. New York, Oakland and the others are in “walker’s paradise.”

Oakland? Really?

I guess Oaklanders can easily walk (I’d suggest briskly walking) to the grocery store, pharmacy or, I’m just guessing here, to their self-defense classes.

The website rewards places where folks can leave their cars parked and get to work and school. Places where you can bank, find day care, get a good meal, exercise or catch a movie.

Let’s face it, it’s tough to leave your car at home here.

Walk Score’s Josh Herst encouraged cities to improve their scores.

In a news release, he said houses in walkable neighborhoods have higher value because of their proximity to amenities.

Plus, they generate less pollution and boast healthier residents, he said. Folks living in walkable neighborhoods typically weigh eight pounds less than residents of a sprawling suburb, according to his research.

I checked out Walk Score’s website, www.WalkScore.com. It’s very cool and include rankings of individual neighborhoods.

Old Colorado City came in first with a 59! Downtown scored a 58. Both are pedestrian-friendly and have lots of public gathering places. They are mixed-use and blend retail, commercial and residential as well as all income levels.

Falcon ranked last with a score of 5 while upscale Flying Horse scored a 6.

There’s other good stuff on the site. For example, it has calculators that will show you the mileage and elevation gain on any route you choose. Here’s a look at my bicycle commute from Rockrimmon to downtown.

But there’s hope for Colorado Springs and its walkability score.

 Ryan Tefertiller, a senior city planner, said recent changes to the downtown zoning encourages “walkability.” And the city would help developers apply walkable concepts in all new neighborhoods.

“I think the zones make sense in certain areas,” he said. “In theory, I could see one in Old Colorado City, or North Nevada Avenue or South Academy Boulevard. It would make sense.”

Sounds great. As long as we improve our score without turning us into another Oakland!

======================================================

NEIGHBORS LOSE IN LANDSLIDE; PROPERTY VALUES GO DOWN IN FLAMES

November 3rd, 2010, 3:51 pm by

Drive up to the Appletree Golf Course off Peaceful Valley Road east of Fountain and see if you can find it. It’s not recognizeable. 

Not the greens, tees, fairways or sand traps. 

It has died of neglect. The sign on Marksheffel Road tells the story. 

There are a few hints that the weedy pasture once was a Lee Trevino-designed golf course. Concrete cart paths betray its past. Also the ghostly, abandoned clubhouse atop the hill overlooking the 156-acre property

 

Here’s a map to the course: 

The place is in foreclosure. It’s owner, Morley Golf, owes $14.2 million on an $18.2 million loan used to buy the closed course in 2006 and renovate it. 

Look past the weeds, willows and thistle and you can see where the money went. 

 Miles of concrete was poured for cart paths and curbs. A new sprinkler system and pumps were installed. The clubhouse was under renovation and expansion. Five holes had been built on a new 220-acre southern expansion of the property. 

The clubhouse sits vacant, abandoned in the midst of a renovation and expansion.

 But in 2008, the bank that made the loan failed and was bought by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. The money dried up and the developer, Jim Morley of Colorado Springs, had to abandon the project. 

Folks who live along the edges of the golf course couldn’t understand why one day the course was poised to reopen and the next it was empty again. 

George Gatchel stands in his sunporch, flanked by what used to be the 14th tee of the Appletree Golf Course. In recent years, it has been an overgrown, weedy pasture.

Neighbors like George and Leta Gatchel had bought their house on the 14th tee in 2001 because they loved the location. George golfs and has a cart he used to buzz around the property serving as a marshal on the course. 

Gatchel fears the closure and abandonment of Appletree has cost him upwards of $100,000 off the value of his home. 

 

Others, like Michael and Donna Leischner, are learning the hard truth about the damage it is doing to property values. 

They bought their home in 2005 when the course was will operating. 

 They were capivated by the view of Pikes Peak over the lake, seen here on the Appletree web site in its glory days. 

Today, the lake is drying and receding. 

The water has left behind caked mud and collecting trash and tumbleweeds. 

 Here’s a look at Appletree from FlashEarth.com before it was abandoned. 

 

Here it is today, as George Gatchel sits in his golf cart amid the fairways of the old course. It looks more like the pastureland it used to be than a golf course. 

 

==========================================================

WATER METER UPDATE with reader suggestions

August 26th, 2010, 10:30 am by

In response to all the calls and e-mails I’m getting about water meters, I want to pass along a few things I’ve heard.

Readers insist meters, and their automated remote reader systems, are not infallible.

Here’s what they suggest if you suspect a discrepancy.

Look for a leak. Start by looking for wet spots in your yard, basement or crawl space. You can also hire a water leak detection expert, although you may need to go to Denver to find one.

Look for a thief. If you live near a construction area, there’s a chance someone simply hooked up a hose to your outdoor faucet and filled a tank. I’ve written about that type of theft. It’s more common than you’d think.

Ask to have the meter tested. It maycost you a service charge. But it’s worth the effort if the bill is high enough. Send the meter to an independent party, such as another utility, for calibration. Or ask your utililty to conduct a side-by-side test installing a second meter next to your original.

Finally, several people warn me about the remote reader systems. Generally, they are reliable in transmitting the meter numbers to the utility. But there are famous incidents where they failed. In Houston in 2007 there was a huge problem and thousands were replaced.

A Side Streets reader in Fountain says the wires of her remote transmitter became frayed and when the bare wires touched, her meter reading surged by 100 gallons.

Others warn than very low flows through the meter can cause them to malfunction. Still others say tiny particles of sand can get into the paddle that turns the meter and cause meter malfunction until the sand becomes dislodged and the meter returns to normal.

====================================================