Side Streets ~ Neighborhood people and issues

Archive for the 'Dublin Terrace Townhomes' Tag

SHOWDOWN FOR TOO TALL TOWNHOMES

February 9th, 2013, 2:00 pm by

Single-familiy homes on Whereabout Court are dwarfed by the Dublin Terrace Townhomes behind them. The townhomes were built contrary to approved plans with larger-than-permitted buildings because the developer was trying to provide unobstructed views to potential buyers.

Will the “Too Tall Townhomes” finally get knocked down to size?

Or just knocked down?

Or will they remain abandoned, inflicting financial and visual pain on the surrounding neighbors?

It’s been almost a year since questions over the size of three new buildings in the Dublin Terrace Townhomes complex erupted, even prompting Mayor Steve Bach to personally inspect the northeast Colorado Springs complex.

The city says the developer of the Dublin Terrace Townhomes raised the grade and built structures not approved for the site, contrary to the development plan.

The controversy eventually resulted in the bankruptcy of the developer Todays Homes and its parent company, Unity Builders Group of Calgary, Canada. And it threw into limbo 10 units — seven in two buildings that are finished and furnished and ready for sale and three units in one building with no roof.

In January, city planners rejected a request from the court-appointed receiver to allow the buildings to remain, as-is, with additional landscaping to buffer the neighbors’ view.

Planner Rick O’Connor’s rejection set up a showdown on Feb. 21 when an appeal is to be heard before the Colorado Springs Planning Commission.

Seven townhomes in two buildings are finished and furnished and ready for sale. But three units in a third building are in the early stage of construction. The building doesn’t even have a roof and weather is rotting the wood.

An attorney for the receiver, Andrew Checkley of MLP Receiverships in St. Louis, responded in documents that moving the buildings or demolishing them are not viable options for Pittsburgh-based PNC Bank, one of the nation’s largest banks, which owns the loans and is facing claims exceeding $1 million, including mechanic liens.

In the documents, the receiver continued a year-long debate over the height issue, arguing the city has wrongly assessed the height. The receiver insists the buildings are just four feet higher than allowed, not upwards of 11 feet as the city claims.

And Checkley raises the possibility that PNC might simply walk away, leaving the buildings to rot, unless the city agrees to let them stay.

“(PNC) has no obligation to foreclose or to take ownership of the property,” Checkley wrote. “This is the worst-case scenario for all parties involved. Unfortunately, given the finances of the project . . . and the competing demands of the interested parties, it may be the most likely scenario.”

Checkley warns that vacant and abandoned buildings erode property values, reduce the city tax base, anger neighbors and “may attract irresponsible social activity.”

Quite a scare tactic. It’s one voiced months ago by Todays Homes and now by Checkley and it has the attention of neighbors who are angry at the suggestion and fear being steamrolled by bureaucrats who don’t care about the neighbors.

“They don’t care about anybody but the bank,” said Bill Sheridan, whose single-family home on Whereabout Court, just across the fence, is dwarfed by the Too Talls.

Bill Sheridan, left, and Tom Fendon survey the Too Tall Townhomes in this September 2012 photo. They and dozens of other neighbors stand to lose thousands in equity in their homes as the buildings rot in bankruptcy.

Similar frustration is felt by Tom Fendon, who lives in a Dublin Terrace Townhome in one of the 56 units in about 15 completed and occupied buildings in the complex.

“It doesn’t get any better,” Fendon said. “It doesn’t look good as far as getting this taken care of. Meanwhile, all the people here are losing money as far as property values go.”

Of course, their positions reflect how hard this problem is to fix.

Sheridan is adamant the Too Talls must come down, insisting property values of the homes on his street all suffered when the behemoths went up.

Fendon, however, said its his neighbors in the other townhomes who are suffering the most.

“Most of us are under water,” he said. “This affects 51 townhome owners. We can’t sell because everything has stopped. There are only eight or nine homes across the fence affected by this.”

Deciding what happens next isn’t the only question Fendon wants answered. He still wants someone held accountable at City Hall.

“I walk through the community and ask myself the same question,” Fendon said. “Why was this allowed?

======================================

 

 

DEVELOPER SAYS MASSIVE TOWNHOMES BUILT ‘BY MISTAKE’

April 5th, 2012, 11:21 am by
Three new buildings in the Dublin Terrace Townhomes complex tower over the adjacent neighborhood. The city said the buildings violate the site development plan. Deverlop Todays Homes says their construction was “a mistake.”

Jeanne English knew something was wrong a few months ago when construction crews began piling mountains of dirt behind her fence to start three new buildings in the Dublin Terrace Townhomes.

She and other neighbors knew the hard-fought site development plan approved by the city in 2006 called for Todays Homesto build lower-profile townhomes that slope down, with the natural grade, not sit atop 7 feet of dirt.

One of three Dublin Terrace Townhome buildings built in violation of the development plan, the city says.

But before long, her home and the others on Whereabout Court, along with several on Many Springs Drive, were being dwarfed by three towering new townhome buildings, each upwards of 35-40 feet tall.

“I look out my window and their front doors are higher than my fence,” English said. “These buildings loom over me. This is crazy.”

The development plan called for the townhomes to slope down with the grade. Instead, developer Todays Homes hauled in tons of dirt, built a retaining wall and elevated the entire structures about 7 feet, the city says.

Now, those buildings are ready for occupancy but the city won’t allow it because officials say they are in serious violation of the development plan.

Todays Home president Mil Younkers says the structures were built by mistake and he’s asking the Colorado Springs Planning Commission at its April 19 meeting to amend the 2006 site plan and let them remain.

Younkers insists it’s not a case of a rogue developer deliberately ignoring the blueprints, building what he wanted and then asking forgiveness once construction was finished.

“No one maliciously went out and built those units,” Younkers said.

The city-approved development plan called for lower-profile structures, like the brown building in the middle, to be adjacent to the neighborhood, on the left, and buffer the homes from more massive buildings like the one on the right.

 “We’ve told the homeowners it was a mistake. We told the city we made a mistake. Now how do we rectify it?”

Younkers said the error is the result of a complete change in leadership at Todays Homes in 2009 when he was hired as president and brought in a new team.

He said his team struggled to sell three townhomes in the first low-profile building constructed a year ago.

“The market was not responding to the units approved for those lots,” he said. “We made the marketing decision to build (larger) units.

“We contacted our surveyor and confirmed they would fit and we made the change.”

But the development plan dictates what could be built, I told him.

The blueprints show exactly which type building goes on which lot. There was no ambiguity I could see. How could that be a mistake?

“No one understood specific building types were called out on that plan,” Younkers said. “It got by us all.”

New Dublin Terrace Townhome buildings tower over a home on Whereabout Court.

English scoffed at that explanation. Me, too.

“They are professional builders,” she said. “How could you not know that?”

Younkers added that the city should have caught the error when Todays Homes requested building permits or during multiple inspections by the Regional Building Department.

This comparison shows how the foundation of the original lower-profile townhome on the left slopes down with the natural grade while the new building on the right steps up and sits atop a retaining wall and 7-feet of dirt.

City planner Rick O’Connor rejects that suggestion, pointing to the blueprints, which spell out detailed guidelines for grading and building types.

“We had very specific conditions on the developer to address the impacts of size, scale and bulk of this project on the adjacent single family homes,” O’Connor said. “That’s why we required lower-profile units next to the neighborhood.”

So what happens now, I wondered.

The city is evaluating the Todays Homes proposal and taking neighbors’ suggestions.

The feedback is not terribly positive.

“Tear them down,” said Bill Sheridan, a seven-year Whereabout Court resident. “The developer admitted they couldn’t make any money selling the smaller units. So they decided to build the larger buildings.

One of Todays Homes floorplans for the Dublin Terrace Townhomes

“The city ought to pull their license, fine them to the maximum extent of the law, tear them down and put in what was approved.”

 

Would the city be satisfied with Younkers’ suggestion he chop 8 feet out of the roofs of each building to soften the lines and plant 50 trees to buffer the buildings?

“I think it’s going to very difficult for them to comply with our review criteria,” O’Connor said ominously. “I think moving the buildings may be an option.”

Moving buildings that cost $300,000 or so to build? Really?

“It’s not conceivable that these buildings could be moved,” Younkers said.

Well, then. Maybe a solution will emerge from a neighborhood meeting Younkers is planning next week.

Or, I suppose, they could just take Sheridan’s suggestion: “Blow them up!”

======================================================