Side Streets ~ Neighborhood people and issues

Search Results for "robella"

VILLAGE SEVEN FEUD DRAGS ON AND ON

September 29th, 2010, 2:45 pm by

Meet Bob Robella. He’s the guy on the bicycle with the two dogs running beside him.

He’s riding onto the sidewalk outside the Village Seven home he bought in 2006.

Only problem, the Village Seven Homeowners Association has covenants requiring the dogs stay leashed. Same as city ordinance. The HOA also doesn’t allow folks to breed dogs in their homes. Guess what . . . Robella breeds dogs.

As you can imagine, Robella doesn’t like the HOA or the covenants much. So he has refused to abide by them, or gladly pay his HOA dues, for that matter.

The covenants give the HOA board authority to determine what colors can be painted on homes and fences in the neighborhood. Robella doesn’t care much for that rule, either. So he painted his fence the color he liked. You can see it in the photo.

All this conflict led to the courtroom. Robella lost and was ordered to pay $2,400. But he kept fighting.

For example, he refused to pay dues saying he didn’t own the house anymore. He gave it to a woman in Florida. And he refused to reveal her location so they couldn’t charge her for dues. He claimed harassment when the HOA persisted in in pursuing him for past dues and fines.

He sued the HOA and its president for raising dues and other allegations, including damage to his fence from HOA water sprinklers

Earlier this year, Robella agreed to pay $12,000 to settle the $30,000 bill the HOA was seeking in a lawsuit in 4th Judicial District Court. He also agreed to re-stain his fence and abide by covenants regarding dog breeding, leashes and the rest.

But before the paperwork was finished, Robella reportedly reneged. He disputes what was hammered out in mediation and refused to sign the settlement.

Here’s a look at the settlement document’s signature page. A court clerk signed for Robella, who is labeled a “Disobedient Party” in the notation.

Robella claimed his attorney exceeded his authority in negotiations during binding arbitration. He even sued the HOA again in small claims court.

But there’s hope the dispute may end someday. Robella’s house is listed for sale. Here it is on the real estate agent’s web site:

Here’s a column I wrote in 2009 about Robella and his feud with Village Seven. And here’s a link to the accompanying blog.

==================================================================

WHO DO YOU BELIEVE?

February 1st, 2009, 10:42 pm by

      Bob Robella is determined to take down the Village Seven Homeowners Association board of directors. Even if it means spending every dollar of his savings doing it.

      He’s tired of being told to keep his garage door closed, his trash cans out of sight, his dogs on leashes, his fence painted an approved color.

      Robella want you to believe the Village Seven HOA is run by a rogue board of directors out to abuse its 843 homeowners, especially retirees like himself.

     The HOA, however, says it is being harassed by Robella.

     They describe him as a bully and someone who doesn’t think rules apply to him: he moved into a covenant-controlled community, refuses to pay annual dues and ignores the rules.

      Now, a Colorado Springs judge believes Robella is being ”frivolous and vexatious” in his dealings with the HOA.  Frivolous and vexatious?

       OUCH!

    Robella alleges the board has illegally raised dues, selectively enforced covenants against him and is trying to take his home and run him out of the neighborhood.

    His war with the HOA includes a small claims lawsuit he filed against the board in February 2008 seeking payment of $350 he said it cost him to paint 100 feet of privacy fence a barn red color after it was bleached out by sprinklers watering neighborhood-owned green belt and common areas.

     The HOA countersued for $571 in back dues, fines, interest and administrative costs.  But the HOA offered to waive all the fines if Robella simply paid $96.30 in back dues and agreed to restain his fence an HOA-approved color. Robella agreed and settled the case in front of Magistrate Daniel Winegrad.

     Here’s the fence before and after Robella painted it:

     

     Sounds reasonable, right? Not to Robella, who responded by dropping off a “few” paint chips for the HOA to consider. A “few” as in 251 chips!

    As for settling the back dues, Robella sent the HOA a check for $155. He said it was his share of the back dues and his annual assessment. Only problem, the annual dues are $250. So he still owed another $191.

   And he informed the HOA he no longer was liable for fines or dues because he had transfered ownership to a friend in Florida. And he wouldn’t provide her address.

     Not surprisingly, the situation escalated. The HOA told Robella the rules prohibit breeding of dogs in the neighborhood — he raises Springer spaniels. And it cited him for walking his dogs off leash on Village Seven common areas.

     Here is Robella and his dogs:

     Then came warnings that covenants require garage doors to be down and trash cans kept out of view.

    Robella admits he is guilty of the rules violations and defends his actions. He claims he is victim of a conspiracy. He said his neighbors love his dogs. They don’t care if they run free on his Congenial Place cul de sac. And he will debate for hours whether HOA rules can prevent off-leash dogs on common space.

    So he was shocked to learn last week that he had lost his small claims court. In a big way. Read the decision of magistrate Winegrad and it’s obvious what he thought of Robella.

    “(Robella) has persuaded the court that (he) had no intention of complying with the agreement when he signed it,” Winegrad wrote. “He had engaged in a continuing pattern of frivolous and vexatious activities which have resulted in substantial expense to the (HOA) including the attorney fees which the (HOA) now seeks to recover.”

    As if to underscore his opinion, Winegrad then awarded Village Seven a total victory by ordering Robella to pay those fees, resulting in a judgment of $2,393 plus $23.99 in court costs.

    Robella is furious at the judge’s decision and insists he will appeal. And he will fight the counter suit filed by the HOA in district court. That suit has dramatically raised the stakes and the cost of settling for Robella.

    And it will make it virtually impossible to sell his house. The house is tagged with a “pending lawsuit” warning flag. He said real estate agents will steer clients clear of the house until the lawsuit is resolved.

    Stick around. This one is far from being resolved.

====================================