Side Streets ~ Neighborhood people and issues

Archive for November, 2011

REDEVELOPING VACANT HOUSES, BUILDINGS COULD GET BOOST FROM UTILITIES

November 20th, 2011, 11:31 am by

Chip Landman testifies before the Colorado Springs City Council, sitting in its dual role as the Utilities Board, on Sept. 21, 2011.

In 2006, Chip Landman bought a dilapidated building out of foreclosure and started making plans to restore it — exactly the kind of “infill” development City Hall has promoted for years.

Due to the recession, the building sat until 2009 when Landman learned from Colorado Springs Utilities that it would cost him thousands to reconnect the water and sewer services, which had been shut off when the bank took the property back years earlier.

The huge cost of essentially turning a water valve created what Landman called “a chilling effect on redevelopment of old blighted properties.”

It seems most of the Colorado Springs City Council agree and will consider slashing fees for restoring utility service based on sweeping changes suggested by Utilities staff.

Colorado Springs City Council president Scott Hente

“I’ve heard support for bringing this forward to City Council,” council President Scott Hente told the staff at an Oct. 19 meeting of the council, sitting as the Utilities Board. The council is expected to consider the new fees Dec. 13.

Besides making it cheaper to redevelop commercial property, the proposed fee reductions would apply to residential properties, which have gone into foreclosure by the thousands.

For decades, Utilities didn’t charge to restore utilities unless a property sat disconnected five years or longer. At that point it was deemed abandoned and fees imposed.

In 2006, the codes changed and service was not considered abandoned until 10 years elapsed. Also, Utilities instituted a two-year grace period, after which service restoration fees were imposed. Beginning in 2010, the abandonment period was extended to 20 years.

Dave Munger, president of the Council of Neighbors and Organizations

Under the proposal Utilities proposed, the two-year grace period would grow to five years. And fees would drop. For example, instead of paying about $10,000 to reconnect residential service deemed abandoned, it would be capped at $3,008.

Savings would be even greater for commercial customers. For a 2-inch meter inactive 10 years, reconnection would drop from about $14,000 to about $4,600. And restoring abandoned service would plunge from the current $116,000 to $14,000.

The proposed fee reduction is welcome news to neighborhood activist Dave Munger, president of the Council of Neighbors & Organizations. He said he’s heard many complaints about the fees.

“It’s in everyone’s best interest to figure out ways to encourage infill,” Munger said. “I’m glad to hear Utilities is rethinking its position on reconnection fees.”

Andrew Knauf stands outside his house on West Pikes Peak Avenue. He turned off the utilities in 1993. When he called to get service reconnected about three months ago, he was told it would cost more than $11,000. He is appealing.

It’s unclear if the new fees will help Andrew Knauf, who turned off utilities in 1993 to a house he owns on West Pikes Peak Avenue.

When he tried to restore water and sewer a few months ago, he was told it would cost more than $11,000. He is appealing.

“We’re talking about turning a valve,” Knauf said. “I can’t afford $11,000.”

 ============================================================

IVYWILD FUROR OVER HALFWAY HOUSES IS NOT NEWS TO RUBY AND BENNIE

November 18th, 2011, 7:31 pm by

Ruby and Bennie Belton operated Restoration House Ministries just north of this sign on South Tejon Street in 2008-2011. They posed Nov. 8, 2011.

Ruby and Bennie Belton are not surprised by the furor that erupted in Ivywild recently around a proposal to house 30 men with histories of substance abuseex-convicts released on parole, men sentenced to probation, homeless vets and other self-referrals — in the Unida House sober-living facility on Cheyenne Boulevard.

A similar storm of public outcry enveloped Ruby and Bennie in 2008 when they proposed converting a halfway house for women, also in Ivywild, into a faith-based facility for men.

Bennie, a former prison minister, wanted to open Restoration House Ministries because he felt a spiritual calling to help.

This was home to Restoration House Ministries, which operated 2008-2011. Ruby and Bennie Belton opened the house to provide a faith-based facility for women leaving prison.

“I had great faith there could be deliverance,” Bennie said. “We were going to help them become responsible citizens, good husbands and fathers.”

But their dream changed abruptly when the protest reached the City Council, which sided with neighbors.

Ruby and Bennie reverted to a women-only facility,  eight at a time, and staffed it around the clock.

“We wanted to rehabilitate them,” Ruby said. “But the women had different agendas. Hidden agendas.”

Ivywild is a neighborhood south of downtown Colorado Springs and northeast of the Broadmoor area.

Ruby and Bennie soon discovered their clients had learned how to manipulate and lie — whether in prison, the county jail or simply by associating with other drug addicts and criminals.

“The Department of Corrections warned us about what we’d see,” Bennie said. “I was surprised to find they were right. It turned out they knew what they were talking about.”

The couple said many of the women had no intention of embracing the faith-based rehab offered at Restoration House.

“In my believing heart, I wanted to give them another chance,” Bennie said. “We were really taken advantage of.”

Some broke curfew, took drugs and snuck around in violation of rules.

“We were trying to do what Christ taught: help the least among us; those in need,” Bennie said. “But they used us. We were just an address to get them out of prison. We were a place to stay and food to eat until they could catch up with their old partners.”

A few women embraced the program and flourished. But not enough. Ruby and Bennie closed Restoration House in February.

They shake their head at the thought of nearby Unida House hosting 30 men.

“The neighbors have reason to worry,” Ruby said. “Thirty is a lot of men.

“I’d say have no more than 8 or 10.”

Bennie said it will take a large, trained staff to manage a house that large.

“How can you supervise that many people?” Bennie said.

He also has a request of Ivywild to compromise.

“I understand it scares them,” Bennie said. “But I hope the neighborhood recognizes there’s a need for this kind of facility. Both sides need to work together.”
Read more: http://www.gazette.com/articles/vogrin-128625-furor-ivywild.html#ixzz1e6e9NhJG

==========================================================

IVYWILD FEARS EX-CONS WITH DRUG, BOOZE ISSUES

November 13th, 2011, 11:30 am by

 

In 2008, the Ivywild neighborhood south of downtown Colorado Springs erupted when a prison minister tried to convert a halfway house for women into a facility for men.

Opponents had visions of violent ex-conskillers, sex offenders and drug addicts — moving to Ivywild fresh out of prison and terrorizing the neighborhood.

They didn’t believe the minister could handle 13 men or enforce rules of sobriety, curfews and Christian behavior.

The opposition was so vocal the City Council ignored the city planner, overturned the planning commission and sided with neighbors.

Men were out.

Now the issue is back.

If Tony Huerena gets his way, his Unida House on Cheyenne Boulevard would host 30 men with substance abuse problems on parole or probation.

Ivywild is erupting again.

It doesn’t matter Huerena’s 15-bedroom facility was a boarding house and then the Ray of Hope assisted living center for mentally ill adults for at least 30 years before it closed in 2007.

 Click here to watch as KOAA TV 5 walks through the facility with Huerena.

Neighbors don’t want ex-cons with substance abuse problems living there.

Especially now.

The neighborhood is trying to attract new residents and businesses after being rocked in recent years by the closing of its elementary school the loss of a historic church.

Unida House is located on Cheyenne Boulevard and critics say it is too close to the Family Life Services home for women and children to the south. They also worry it will hurt efforts to reopen the Ivywild Elementary School as a business center.

Even worse, homeless, prostitutes and drug dealers from South Nevada Avenue and Brookside Street seemed to be creeping deeper into Ivywild.

When accountant Martin Harper learned of the plan on the Ivywild Facebook page, he quickly contacted City Council members.

“This neighborhood has already been declared blighted by the city in an effort to make some improvements,” Harper said. “I don’t think bringing a bunch of convicts in with drug problems is going to help or prevent it from being blighted.”

A neighborhood meeting hosted by city planners left Harper and others more agitated.  Many walked out.

 

Unida House is an odd-shaped facility. It appears from the street to be a bungalow, built in 1945. But it has a U-shaped addition in the back which houses most of its 15 bedrooms. It has a community kitchen and bathroom.

They were shocked to learn Unida House has been open 18 months with five men, the maximum it can have and avoid supervision as a human services operation.

And they were upset city planner Mike Schultz had decided to recommend approval for 15 men to the City Planning Commission at a hearing scheduled Nov. 17.

“This seems to be taking the neighborhood in the wrong direction,” Harper said. “Are we going to improve the neighborhood or not?”

That sentiment echoed with every Ivywild resident I spoke to last week.

The message was heard at City Hall, too. Schultz told me late Thursday that he would ask the planning commission to postpone the case to allow more neighborhood meetings.

Heurena is disappointed but vows to push ahead.

“I just want to help people,” he said. “Maybe we can reach a compromise. Maybe the neighborhood would accept women instead of men. I’m willing to listen.”

In March 2008, I wrote this column about a proposed halfway house for men in Ivywild and then this follow-up column a few days later.

On May 11, 2011, I posted this blog about Ivywild and blight as well as this column.

Here’s a link to the 34-page application before the City Planning Commission.

==========================================================

SHOULD HOA MANAGERS BE LICENSED, REGULATED BY STATE?

November 9th, 2011, 2:10 pm by

Michelle Green

Michelle Green has worked in the homeowners association management business 15 years. She manages the Flying Horse Homeowners Association as an employee of Hammersmith Management.

 It’s more than just a job overseeing enforcement of covenants, collecting dues and hiring maintenance and landscaping crews.

Green has devoted many personal hours and money to taking classes and getting certified, by an industry peer review group, in various aspects of the business.

She’s proven her proficiency at record-keeping, handling financial statements, perusing insurance policies, navigating government regulations of HOAs and more.

In fact, this week she’s mailing in her final exam for grading as she tries to earn certification as a Professional Community Association Manager, or PCAM, from the Community Associations Institute, a nationwide umbrella group for managers like her. Green is a member of the Southern Colorado Chapter of CAI.

 Achieving PCAM status is the pinnacle of HOA management.

So it bothers her that a lot of people out there seem to wake up one morning and decide they are HOA managers and start trying to run large associations.

“Anybody can hang a shingle on the door and call themselves a management company with no previous experience,” Green said. “They’ve got the checkbooks for the associations. They are doing the financials. They should be monitored so associations don’t lose money or get embezzled.”

In fact, HOA fraud is problem. I’ve written about several HOAs victimized by crooks posing as managers.

But a more common problem is simple mismanagement by rookies which leads to huge legal and financial disputes within an HOA.

Complaints against HOAs are so widespread the Colorado General Assembly created the HOA Information and Resource Center to get a handle on the nature and seriousness of the problems. See previous blogs about the HOA office.

Aaron Acker, HOA Information Officer, spoke to a group of property managers on Feb. 15, 2011, in Colorado Springs.

After nearly a year of taking calls, Aaron Acker, the state HOA information officer, is preparing a report to be delivered to lawmakers during their 2012 legislative session.

Leaders of the CAI’s Rocky Mountain chapter fear the report to be a less-than-glowing assessment of HOAs. They expect shock and outrage. To minimize the anticipated fallout, they have made a preemptive strike.

Last week, the Colorado chapter of the CAI asked the state Department of Regulatory Agencies, or DORA, to initiate an investigation of HOA managers to determine if it’s time for them to join manicurists, barbers and boxers among the dozens of professions licensed and regulated by the state. Check out the list of all the professions licensed by the state!

Green is all for licensing and regulation.

“It would be beneficial for HOAs and their boards if managers were monitored and licensed,” she said. “Managers are handling thousands of dollars, if not millions. Nail technicians and hair stylists all have licensure. Why should someone managing your homeowners association be any different?”

Good question.

I also spoke to Chris Pacetti, a Denver-area manager who is also chairman of the Rocky Mountain CAI’s manager licensing committee. He says the group asked for the investigation by DORA in advance of Acker’s report.

Pacetti said licensing is not new. Nine states and Washington D.C. have enacted manager licensing or certification standards and seven more states are debating the idea.

His group envisions a two-prong test for managers.

One would test an applicant’s skills and knowledge in managing homeowners associations. The other would test for knowledge of Colorado law regarding HOAs.

They would be similar, Pacetti said, to the tests given for basic certification in the industry.

For example, to reach the first rung on the property manager certification ladder, Green took a two-day course followed by a 100-question multiple-choice test.

 Then came the CMCA or Certified Manager of Community Associations exam and another 100 questions. After she logged five years in the industry and passed those two tests, she took the AMS to earn accreditation as an Association Management Specialist.

Now she’s seeking the PMAC.

Green and Pacetti think it’s reasonable to expect every property manager to have a basic education and command of issues before taking the reins of a homeowners association.

But it’s not guaranteed that DORA will agree when it concludes its Sunrise study, likely in 120 days or so.

Attorney Jerry Orten tells me the Legislature studied the issue in 1990 and concluded that new rules were needed to bond managers and protect HOA finances by mandating separate accounts for finances and strict accounting to HOAs of their finances. But lawmakers did not order licensing.

Orten believes licensing would elevate the overall level of servivce to homeowners, resulting in fewer complaints to the new HOA information office.

To recommend licensing managers, DORA must decide the request satisfies three key criteria:

  1. Whether the unregulated practice of homeowner association management harms the public and whether potential for harm is easily recognized.
  2. Whether the public needs and can be reasonably expected to benefit from occupational competence.
  3. Whether protection for homeowners can be achieved by other means in a more cost-effective manner.

 In other words, DORA must find that licensing is needed to protect the health safety and welfare of homeowner, that there is a public need and similar benefit is not available by other means.

Of course, if DORA declines to initiate licensing, individual lawmakers can bypass the agency and simply introduce a bill requiring it.

Stay tuned, HOA fans!

===========================================================

DRILLING IS A FRACKING DISASTER WAITING TO HAPPEN!

November 6th, 2011, 11:30 am by

El Paso County Commissioner Dennis Hisey

Recently, El Paso County Commissioner Dennis Hisey suggested an energy company’s plan to drill three exploratory wells likely won’t cause “a lot of heart burn” because the sites aren’t “getting close to people’s barns and houses.”

I tried to reach Hisey for days to ask him about that observation because I’m hearing from neighbors who are grabbing for rolls of Tums at the thought of Englewood-based Ultra Resources converting the Banning-Lewis Ranch from a sprawling subdivision into a massive oil and natural gas field.

Especially concerned are the 700-plus homeowners in Colorado Centre and another 70 or so homeowners in adjacent Cuchares Ranch.

They rely on four wells drilled into the shallow alluvium of Jimmy Camp Creek to supply their drinking water. They are frightened by the thought of wildcatters a few miles away using a controversial technique of “hydraulic fracturing” in which they blast chemicals and water into shale formations to break the rock and release oil and gas.

Critics blame the so-called fracking technique for damaging the environment and contaminating underground drinking water supplies.

“Some of our residents have come to us with questions,” said Joan Lucia-Treese, a member of the Colorado Centre Metro District board. “The first of the three wells is not terribly far from us. Some residents are concerned. Our board has concerns.”

The well in question would be at the corner of Drennan and Curtis roads, about three miles south of Schriever Air Force Base and about six miles east of Colorado Centre and Cuchares Ranch.

What could go wrong?

Enough, actually, that many residents are worried.

But drilling, apparently, can’t be banned. Only regulated. And folks in Colorado Centre want their elected officials to take a hard look at the project.

“We’re not trying to stop anyone from drilling,” said Al Testa, manager of the metro district. “But if there is any contamination, it’s going to get to us very quickly because our water is alluvium water. Not from a deep aquifer.”

Colorado Centre, with Jimmy Camp Creek on the right, as seen from www.FlashEarth.com

In other words, it flows just below the surface so it’s especially vulnerable to contamination.

“We want to make sure there is a mitigation plan in case they end up polluting our community’s only water source,” Testa said.

Seems reasonable. Wish I could have asked Hisey about it and, perhaps, gotten some assurances.

“Our concern is ‘what if’ and what do we do,” Lucia-Treese said. “Who makes the call in the event of an accident?

“What happens in that 24- to 48-hour period before the state declares an emergency and the oil company must begin remediation? Am I buying tons of bottled water for our 800 homes?  How long do we have to wait for reimbursement from the oil company? What kind of remediation can we expect?”

Makes me want to say: No fracking way!

==========================================================

HOW MANY FENCES HAVE TO DIE?

November 2nd, 2011, 12:29 pm by

 .

Tire tracks and smashed fence slats . . . it's a familiar sight to Mitch Logue. He's experienced the same thing 13 times in the 15 years he's lived in his Rockrimmon home.

A predawn wreck that destroyed part of Mitch Logue’s fence a few weeks ago turned out to be his lucky break.

The young driver who turned part of Mitch’s privacy fence into toothpicks was the 13th motorist in 15 years to hit the fence.

How is that lucky? 

Mitch Logue's backyard resembles a haunted forest with trees leaning at ugly angles and missing bark due to 15 years of pounding from 13 cars that have crashed through his fence.

It turns out 13 wrecks was enough to convince the city it was time to protect Logue and his next-door neighbor from the wild-eyed NASCAR wanna-bes who have crashed their cars into their backyard fences.

Usually, they are turning at the T-shaped intersection of Vindicator Drive and Rockrimmon Boulevard.

I’m guessing most were speeding, texting, cell-phoning their BFF, stuffing their pieholes, firing up a doobie or doing something more important than keeping both hands on the wheels and both eyes on the road.

Longtime Side Streets readers — both of you — may recall I wrote about Mitch and his next-door neighbors, Donald and Colleen Kunecke, in 2009 after another spate of marauding, fence-smashing motorists.

Mitch Logue has replaced a half dozen trees killed by cars crashing his fence. I call them Nature's Guardrails. But he's hoping the city will build a real guardrail to protect his yard.

.
In July 2009, Mitch had just spent $3,600 rebuilding his fence when a small SUV plowed into his yard, taking out a brand new fence post and a slew of slats.

Things were quiet until this past June when a young girl missed the turn, hit the curb and landed against the fence. Mitch said he was able to make minor repairs at no cost.

Then came a recent predawn visit from a fellow who blasted into the fence, smashing a dozen or so slats. He backed out, left Mitch a note offering to pay for the damage and drove home.

Here's a look from FlashEarth.com at the intersection.

“This is the first time I’ve had two in the same year,” Mitch said.

It’s not just the fence Mitch is worried about.

A sidewalk runs between his fence and the street and it is heavily used by kids going to nearby Eagleview Middle School as well as neighbors walking to the Safeway center.

“Every one of the cars that has hit my fence had to cross that sidewalk,” he said. “It’s a real safety issue.”

Here's how Mitch Logue's new fence looked in July 2009 after it was smashed.

City traffic engineer Dave Krauth agrees. After I told Krauth on Monday of the latest two wrecks, he sent some his staff out to re-evaluate the intersection.

By Wednesday afternoon, Krauth had a decision.

“The good news is we’re going to install a guardrail,” Krauth said, adding that he hopes it can be squeezed between the curb and sidewalk.

 ”But if we can’t fit it there, we’ll put it right against the fence.”

Krauth said the guardrail would run 100 feet, protecting both Mitch and the Kunecke home.

In the past, traffic engineers have rejected a guardrail because cars might plow straight into it, not glance off it at an angle.

And engineers didn’t have statistics to support installing a guardrail because few of the wrecks were reported to police.

But Krauth said he’s convinced by the anecdotal evidence offered by neighbors over the years.

Mitch said he’d move his fence in a foot or so to make extra room for a guardrail, if it would help.

“I’d really like people not to run through my fence anymore,” Mitch said. “It’s getting really expensive.”

Once it is installed, as weather permits over the next couple months, Mitch might feel safe enough to actually use his backyard again and even let his granddaughter play there.

“I can’t put anything back there like a playhouse,” Mitch said. “I can’t use my yard at all.”

 

In June 2009, an SUV smashed through the fence of Mitch Logue's next-door neighbor, coming to rest against one of Nature's Guardrails.

========================================================